Got more questions? Use our contact page.
C4 and C5 are levels on a scale of Christ-centered communities. This scale was created by John Travis (pseudonym) and attempts to look at Christ-centered communities and place them in a category.
The scale is as follows:
C1: Christian in churches radically different from their own culture, where worship is in a language other than their mother tongue.
C2: Same as C1, but worship is in the Christian’s mother tongue.
C3: Christians in culturally indigenous Christian churches that avoid cultural forms seen as connected to their religious past (i.e. Islamic, Buddhist, Post-Modernism, etc..)
C4: Christians in culturally indigenous congregations that retain biblically permissible past religious forms (e.g., prostrating in prayer, etc…), investing these with biblical meaning. They may call themselves something other than Christians (e.g., “followers of Jesus”), but do not see themselves as part of their previous religious belief system (i.e. Muslim, Buddhist, etc…).
C5: Muslims (Buddhists, etc…) who follow Jesus as Lord and Savior in fellowships of like-minded believers within the Muslim (Buddhist, etc…) community, continuing to identify culturally and officially as Muslims (Buddhists, etc…).
C6: Secret/underground believers.
One problem is that these scales are vague, and much can fall under them. Some may consider C4 as possibly biblical, though it depends on what the actual “permissible” forms of christian expression are. The biggest controversy tends to be in C4 & C5. Ultimately, the C-scale is a culturally biased scale. Made by westerners to put down western culture, and lift up indigenous culture. The problem is, biblically, we are to put aside all culture, and take on the Kingdom culture of Jesus.
“A recent definition calls it, “a popular movement to Christ that bypasses formal and explicit expressions of the Christian religion”. To be more specific, an ‘Insider’, as I understand it, is someone who considers Jesus as their ‘Lord’ and ‘Saviour’, yet who stays inside their culture (in this case their Muslim culture), inside their biological family (what they define as one’s ‘oikos’), continues to call themselves a Muslim (as defined in Sura 5:111), therefore believes the ‘Shahada’ (that God is one, and Muhammad is his prophet), continues to go to the mosque, attempts to pray five times a day, participates in the Ramadan fast, and some believe can go on the Hajj (pilgrimage). As one might imagine, there will be variations on this definition depending on whom you talk to and where they are ministering.” – Jay Smith
Insider Movements usually are in the C5 on the C-Scale, while some grey issues reside in C4. We believe that the Bible is clear that Insider Movements are not merely unbiblical, but very anti-biblical and anti-gospel and result in ‘converts’ to a syncretized new false religion, that is neither Islam, nor Christianity. Insider Movements are not just in Islam, but can be in any religious system, whether buddhism, and so on. This website has many, many articles elaborating why we believe Insider Movements are anti-biblical.
Take Action!
Most Recent Article:
Book: Engaging Islam

Engaging Islam, alerts Christians to the challenges and opportunities of reaching Muslims worldwide. Inspirational stories of transformation and personal testimonies will touch your heart and encourage you to engage Muslims like never before. Author Georges Houssney.Order Now!.
New Book: Chrislam: How Missionaries Are Promoting An Islamized Gospel

An in-depth look into the Insider Movement that is a must read for Missionaries, Pastors, Theologians and the layman. 400-pgs, 25 articles, available from i2 Ministries.
Comment Guidelines:
We encourage commenting on the articles. In order to facilitate this we have the following guidelines.
1. Address the issue in the article that you are commenting on.
2. Stay focused on the issue of the article
3. Each comment needs to cover one point and let us others interact with that point.
4. Comment on the interpretation of scriptures. Point out both the good points and the flaws in the interpretation.
5. Use scripture primarily to support your idea.
6. Let your comment be more about the article than on comments by others. Let us not fight each other. Let us interact with each other.
7. "Let your conversation be always full of grace, seasoned with salt, so that you may know how to answer everyone." (Colossians 4:6)
8. Please use real names. We should know who we are talking with. Pseudonyms, pen-names are not allowed.Please comment and write responsibly in a manner befitting God's glory.
Recent Posts
- Wycliffe, SIL & Frontiers Controversy In the Media
- Fact Check: Biblical Missiology’s Response To Wycliffe’s Comments On “Lost In Translation”
- Lost In Translation: Sign the Petition
- Letters from a Missionary Wife, Part 4
- Letters from a Missionary Wife, Part 3
- Jumping from the Sinking Wycliffe Ship: Why Theology Matters
- John Piper’s Church Takes a Stand on Contextualization
- Letters from a Missionary Wife, Part 2
- Holy Ambassadors
- Tottering at the Abyss: Pergamum and Thyatira’s Courtship with False Religion
- A Few Thoughts Made While Crossing a Minefield
- Letters from a Missionary Wife, Part 1
- Peacemaking Perspectives from a Peace-breaking Missionary
- Book Reviews: Allah: A Christian Response by Miroslav Volf
- INSIDER MOVEMENTS: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT III, 2011 Atlanta, GA
- Global Church, Global Mission
- PodCast – Episode 02 – What’s in a Name?
- Is the Iranian Revival an “Insider Movement?”
- Book Review: Missiological Models in Ministry to Muslims
- “Give me____________or I die”
- Rediscovering the Revelational Church
- PodCast – Episode 01- Arab Spring
- Muslim Follower of Jesus, is this possible?
- Indigenous Believers Speak Out Against C5/Insider Movements
- Pastor Takes a Stand Against False Doctrine and Teaching
Categories
Twitter Updates
- Check out: Insider Movements and the Historical Approach http://t.co/rjIhAqhd 2 hours ago
- Check out: Analyzing the New Winds of Doctrine. http://t.co/cEntWdj8 4 hours ago
- Check out: “Sola Scriptura” Biblical Authority in Missions http://t.co/JPC9RIMm 6 hours ago
- Check out: Contextualizing the Culture not the Gospel http://t.co/BMf2nFJU 8 hours ago
- Check out: PodCast – Episode 02 - What's in a Name? http://t.co/eTouL7Aq 10 hours ago
Recent Comments
- isaacbaroi on Interview: Kevin Greeson of the Camel Method
- Wycliffe/SIL Calls Efforts to Hold them Accountable for Accuracy in Bible Translations ‘Satanic’ | Cracks in the Crescent on Fact Check: Biblical Missiology’s Response To Wycliffe’s Comments On “Lost In Translation”
- Updates from Wycliffe as well as Biblical Missiology « Christ the Truth on Wycliffe, SIL & Frontiers Controversy In the Media
- Updates from Wycliffe as well as Biblical Missiology « Christ the Truth on Lost In Translation: Sign the Petition
- Wycliffe, SIL and Frontiers are Damaging Missionary Efforts Among Muslims on Fact Check: Biblical Missiology’s Response To Wycliffe’s Comments On “Lost In Translation”
Live Blog Stats
Disclaimer
All articles and comments on this website are views of their respective writers and not necessarily of Biblical Missiology or other writers on BiblicalMissiology.Org.

Twitter
Facebook
RSS